______________________________________________________________________________
OPINION OF TRUSTEES
______________________________________________________________________________
In Re
Complainant: Employee
Respondents: Employers
ROD Case No: 84-470 – November 4, 1987
Board of Trustees: Joseph P. Connors, Sr., Chairman; Paul R. Dean, Trustee;
William B. Jordan, Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr., Trustee.
Pursuant to Article IX of the United Mine Workers of America (“UMWA”) 1950 Benefit Plan
and Trust, and under the authority of an exemption granted by the United States Department of
Labor, the Trustees have reviewed the facts and circumstances of this dispute concerning the
provision of health benefits coverage for an Employee under the terms of the Employer Benefit
Plan.
Background Facts
The Complainant was employed in a classified job with Master Mining, Inc., from September
1983 until about March 8, 1984, when Master Mining ceased operations. Master Mining became
signatory to the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement (“Wage Agreement”) of 1981 on
September 7, 1983. Funds’ records indicate that during the 24-month period prior to March 8,
1984, the Complainant worked 974 hours for Master Mining. The Complainant has submitted
copies of unpaid bills for medical services rendered between March 19, 1984 and March 21,
1984.
The Complainant went to work for Neibert Coal Company (“Neibert”) on or about March 22,
1984, when Neibert became signatory to the 1981 Wage Agreement. The Complainant has stated
that Neibert operated at the same mine site and employed the same Employees as had Master
Mining. There is no evidence that Neibert expressly assumed the health benefit obligations of
Master Mining. The 1981 Wage Agreement expired on September 30, 1984. Hours of service
reported to the Funds by Neibert and evidence submitted by the Complainant indicate that the
Complainant continued working for Neibert until October 26, 1984, when Neibert ceased
operations. The Complainant has submitted a copy of an unpaid bill for medical services
rendered between October 31, 1984 and November 6, 1984. There is no evidence that Neibert
Coal Company had agreed to an extension of the terms of the 1981 Wage Agreement beyond
September 30, 1984 nor that it signed a Letter of Intent or a Letter of Agreement to comply with
the terms of the 1984 Wage Agreement.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-470
Page 2
The Complainant then worked for Jamax, Inc., which took over the mine site previously operated
by Master Mining and Neibert. Jamax, Inc. became signatory to the 1984 Wage Agreement on
November 8, 1984. There is no evidence that Jamax expressly assumed the health benefit
obligations of Master Mining or Neibert. Hours of service were reported to the Funds by Jamax
for the Complainant from December 1984 through October 1985, when the Complainant quit to
accept other employment. Funds’ records indicate that Jamax provided health benefits coverage
for its Employees through New York Life Insurance until October 31, 1985; however, the carrier
was unable to verify this information. The Complainant has submitted a copy of an unpaid
medical bill incurred in May 1985.
Dispute
Whether the Respondents are responsible for payment of the Complainant’s outstanding medical
bills.
Positions of the Parties
Position of the Complainant: The Complainant was entitled to health benefits coverage as either
an active or a laid-off Employee when the bills in question were incurred. Therefore, the
Respondents are responsible for payment of the Complainant’s outstanding medical bills.
Position of the Respondent: Master Mining, Inc., has stated that it filed for bankruptcy on
September 8, 1984. Neibert Coal Company and Jamax, Inc., have not responded to repeated
correspondence from Funds’ staff regarding their positions in this dispute.
Pertinent Provisions
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements of 1981 and
1984 provide in pertinent part:
(c) 1974 Plans and Trusts
(3)(i) Each signatory Employer shall establish and maintain an Employee benefit
plan to provide, implemented through an insurance carrier(s), health and other
non-pension benefits for its Employees covered by this Agreement as well as
pensioners, under the 1974 Pension Plan and Trust, whose last signatory
classified employment was with such Employer. The benefits provided by the
Employer to its eligible Participants pursuant to such plans shall be guaranteed
during the term of this Agreement by that Employer at levels set forth in such
plans.
Article I (1), (2), and (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provide:
Article I – Definitions
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-470
Page 3
The following terms shall have the meanings herein set forth:
(1) “Employer” means (Employer’s Name).
(2) “Wage Agreement” means the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1981 [1984], as amended from time to time and any
successor agreement.
(4) “Employee” shall mean a person working in a classified job for the
Employer, eligible to receive benefits hereunder.
Article II A. (4) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article II – Eligibility
The persons eligible to receive the health benefits pursuant to Article III are as follows:
A. Active Employee
(4) A new Employee will be eligible for health benefits from the first day
worked with the Employer.
Article III D. (1)(a) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides:
Article III – Benefits
D. General Provisions
(1) Continuation of Coverage
(a) Layoff
If an Employee ceases work because of layoff, continuation of health, life and
accidental death and dismemberment insurance coverage is as follows:
Number of Hours Worked for
the Employer in the 24
Consecutive Calendar Month
Period Immediately Prior to Period of Coverage
the Employee’s Date Continuation from the
Last Worked Date Last Worked
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-470
Page 4
2,000 or more hours Balance of month plus
12 months
500 or more but less than Balance of month plus
2,000 hours 6 months
Less than 500 hours 30 days
Discussion
Article XX Section (c)(3)(i) of the 1981 and 1984 Wage Agreements require each signatory
Employer to establish and maintain an Employer Benefit Plan to provide health and other nonpension benefits to its Employees. The Wage Agreements stipulate that benefits provided by the
Employer pursuant to such Plan shall be guaranteed during the term of the respective
Agreements.
Article II A. of the Employer Benefit Plan provides health benefits coverage for active
Employees of a signatory Employer. Article III. D. (1)(a) of the Employer Benefit Plan provides
continued benefits coverage for a laid-off Employee for a defined period based on the number of
hours worked for the Employer during the 24-month period prior to the date last worked.
Inasmuch as the Complainant worked 974 hours for Master Mining during the 24-month period
prior to his layoff on March 8, 1984, Master Mining was responsible for the continuation of the
Complainant’s health benefits coverage from March 8, 1984 until March 22, 1984, when the
Complainant accepted employment with Neibert Coal Company. Thus, Master Mining is
responsible for payment of the covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his
eligible dependents between March 8, 1984 and March 21, 1984.
On March 22, 1984, Neibert Coal Company signed the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreement of 1981 for the mine formerly operated by Master Mining. The Complainant worked
for Neibert Coal from March 22, 1984 until October 26, 1984. He has incurred unpaid medical
expenses for services rendered between October 31, 1984 and November 6, 1984. There is no
evidence that Neibert Coal assumed responsibility for the health benefit obligations of Master
Mining. The issue here is whether Neibert Coal was contractually obligated to provide continued
health benefits coverage for the Complainant as a laid-off Employee after the expiration of the
1981 Wage Agreement when it did not sign the 1984 Wage Agreement. Because the
Complainant in this case was laid off after the expiration of 1981 Wage Agreement, and there is
no evidence that the Complainant was working under the terms of either the 1981 or 1984 Wage
Agreements when he was laid off on October 26, 1984, he is
not entitled to the period of continued benefits coverage specified by the Wage Agreements.
Thus, Neibert Coal Company is not responsible for payment of the covered medical expenses
incurred by the Complainant and his eligible dependents between October 31, 1984 and
November 6, 1984.
Opinion of Trustees
Resolution of Dispute
Case No. 84-470
Page 5
On November 8, 1984, Jamax signed the 1984 Wage Agreement for the mine formerly operated
by Master Mining and Neibert Coal. Jamax did not assume responsibility for the health benefit
obligations of Master Mining or Neibert Coal. Inasmuch as the Complainant was an active
Employee of Jamax from December 1984 until October 1985, Jamax is responsible for payment
of the covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant and his eligible dependents in May
1985.
Opinion of the Trustees
Master Mining is responsible for payment of the covered medical expenses incurred by the
Complainant and his eligible dependents between March 8, 1984 and March 21, 1984. Jamax,
Inc. is responsible for payment of the covered medical expenses incurred by the Complainant
and his eligible dependents in May 1985.
The Complainant was not entitled to health benefits coverage at the time medical expenses were
incurred between October 31, 1984 and November 6, 1984.